On December 26, 2016 national postgraduate exam shortly after a number of candidates reported English release title. That night, the information Office of the Ministry of education official Micro-Blog released a statement, saying it would immediately report it to the police for investigation. Grind release problem is not a "new" smell, used to grind after the grind release title of the news. However, after the cheating into the penalty, grind still almost openly selling the answer, still surprised.
Why cheat into the criminal does not converge after? Main reason probably is that the costs were too low and earnings are too high.
2012 grind out results might serve as a case study of the problem, for our analysis of the risks and benefits. In 2012 the national graduate examination, in addition to English, politics, mathematics and Western medicine comprehensive answers be leaked and sold. In 2013 on the CPPCC, members of the National Committee of GE jianxiong question Education Minister Yuan guiren on the spot, requiring them to grind 2012 leaked questions to respond to events, and apologize to all the candidates.
In May 2013, the Ministry of Education announces results of investigation of the leaking problem, leaked questions Xiangtan City Education Examination Yuan Zhou Wensheng, Director of recruitment, who was placed on probation within the, administrative dismissal and other disciplinary action. Articles by institutions, sailing education group in Changsha branch head Chen Liangwei, head of Guangzhou Li Jiahui, was detained.
However, this does not bring any negative impact sail training education. Sail not only did not fall, but to live better. Sell examination answers, which did not become it's stained and "negative assets", that became its selling point and a "gold-plated" into it to attract the next publicity material for candidates. In some colleges and universities on the inner leaflet, saying "sailing vent problem, you know."
If a study section agencies discharge problems, although a few heads were caught, but its operations were not affected, but also more attention to win market. Vent problem can become a "power" shows that more candidates "favored". And those institutions that concentrate on training, it might be because they don't play by the rules of popular institutions and loss of competitiveness. This market must be the bad money drives out good money, no health and fair at all.
After 2012 grind large area leakage problems, the Ministry of education requires universities to take remedial measures, to strengthen the students ' study, but rarely have candidates pay to buy answers. Hard to review a few months, but less than the thousands of dollars to buy answers did well, will carefully review candidate who brings "10,000 damage", would stimulate more candidates who would not otherwise be willing to cheat to break the rules.
Relief, postgraduate training institution, purchase answer to question candidates in the event of leakage tests can get higher yields, with tiny, little risk. In front of the risk/earnings ratio, leakage problem events occur frequently, also let people "normal". Exclusive after the 16 people confirmed Changzhou
On November 1 this year the implementation of the amendments to the Penal Code (nine) for cheating in the exam for the first time provisions of a specific crime. Clearly states: for the Act of cheating, to illegally sell or provide exam questions and answers provided in the first paragraph, to three years ' imprisonment or criminal detention, or be fined; the circumstances are serious, shall be sentenced to imprisonment between three to seven years and fined. Discharge the graduate exam questions after the event was cheating into the penalty, national incidents of cheating in the exams for the first time. Therefore, it is the punishment of cheating in a big test. We expect the criminal to let all the participants pay a due price.
No comments:
Post a Comment